Check out the live video from salons@nationalacademy featuring:
Congrats to Kathy Butterly, NA for being amongst 30 recipients of the 2017 biennial grants from The Louis Comfort Tiffany Foundation!
The Louis Comfort Tiffany Foundation announced the recipients of its 2017 biennial grants. Thirty artists who work in painting, drawing, sculpture, photography, video, craft, and new media will each be awarded $20,000 in order to produce new work. In May 2018, their artwork will be documented in a catalogue published by the foundation.
The recipients were chosen from a pool of 156 people, who were nominated by artists, critics, museum professionals, and foundation trustees. The seven-member jury was made up of Phong Bui, cofounder and artistic director of the Brooklyn Rail; Ruth Estévez, the director and curator of REDCAT Gallery in Los Angeles; Alison de Lima Greene, a curator at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston; Chrissie Iles, a curator at the Whitney Museum of American Art; artist Charles LeDray; artist Kerry James Marshall; and Bruce W. Pepich, the executive director and curator of collections at the Racine Art Museum in Wisconsin.
“Few events are more exciting and encouraging than being nominated to compete for prizes you can't apply for,” Marshall, a former grantee and foundation trustee, said. “It is the kind of endorsement that gets the wind at your back, and since my 1993 Tiffany grant, it's been full speed ahead.”
Established in 1918 by Louis Comfort Tiffany, son of Tiffany & Company founder Charles Louis Tiffany, the foundation has distributed nearly $10,000,000 in awards to five hundred artists nationwide since it launched its biennial competition in 1980. In November 2017, the Aspen Institute recognized the foundation’s service to artists with its service salute.
The full list of recipients is as follows:
Nina Chanel Abney, Jersey City, NJ
niv Acosta, Brooklyn, NY
Kathy Butterly, New York, NY
Karon Davis, Ojai, CA
Abigail DeVille, Fort Lee, NJ
Rafa Esparza, Pasadena, CA
Raque Ford, Brooklyn, NY
Juliana Huxtable, Brooklyn, NY
Kahlil Joseph, Los Angeles, CA
Titus Kaphar, New Haven, CT
Ellen Lesperance, Portland, OR
Candice Lin, Altadena, CA
Tiona Nekkia McClodden, Philadelphia, PA
Zachary Meisner, Austin, TX
Ebony G. Patterson, Lexington, KY
Beverly Penn, Austin, TX
Sondra Perry, Perth Amboy, NJ
Peter Pincus, Penfield, NY
Sean Raspet, Los Angeles, CA
Wendy Red Star, Portland, OR
Cameron Rowland, Queens, NY
Jessica Sanders, Brooklyn, NY
Beatriz Santiago Muñoz, San Juan, PR
Regina Scully, New Orleans, LA
Kaneem Smith, Houston, TX
Matthew Solomon, Lake Huntington, NY
Jesse Stecklow, Los Angeles, CA
Martine Syms, Los Angeles, CA
Kazumi Tanaka, Beacon, NY
Tomas Vu-Daniel, New York, NY
A curator and arts writer, Maura Reilly has dedicated her career to contemporary art in/of/from the margins. She was the Founding Curator of the Elizabeth A. Sackler Center for Feminist at the Brooklyn Museum, the first museum exhibition space of its kind in the world. Established through the generosity of the Elizabeth A. Sackler Foundation, it is an exhibition and education environment dedicated to feminist art — its past, present, and future. While working at the Center, Reilly organized multiple exhibitions, including the permanent installation of Judy Chicago’s The Dinner Party and the blockbuster Global Feminisms co-curated with Linda Nochlin.
Reilly has curated, lectured, and published extensively, both nationally and internationally, and has been a regular contributor to Art in America since 1998. She is the author and editor of many books and articles on contemporary art, including a monograph on Ghada Amer, ARTnews Special Issue on Women in the Art World, Women Artists: The Linda Nochlin Reader and Curatorial Activism: Towards an ethics of Curating.
She has received numerous awards, including a prestigious Future Women Leadership Awards in celebration of ArtTable’s 25th year Anniversary, a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Women’s Caucus for Art, and in 2015 was voted one of the 50 most powerful people in the art world by both Blouin Art Info and Art+Auction.
On Curatorial Activism
This year, Maura Reilly has published Curatorial Activism: Towards an Ethics of Curating, a handbook of new curatorial strategies, based on pioneering examples of innovative recent efforts to offset racial and gender disparities in the art world. Addressing the current art world statistics and the continual underrepresentation of female artists, Reilly asks:
How can we get people in the art world to think about gender, race, and sexuality, to understand that these are persistent concerns that require action?; How can we all contribute to ensuring that the art world becomes more inclusive?
Indeed, Reilly’s book urges us not to sit and wait for change to come, but calls to action in order to create an art world that is just. Focusing on feminism, race and sexuality in thematic sections, the author exposes disparities and exclusionary models of collecting and display, but at the same time examines and illustrates pioneering exhibitions and initiatives that show that new approaches and inclusive solutions are possible.
Celebrating the work of numerous curatorial activists that have committed themselves to insurrectionist initiatives, including Jean Hubert Martin, Okwui Enwezor, Rosa Martinez, Jonathan Katz, Camille Morineau, Michiko Kasahara, and Paweł Leszkowicz, Reilly offers a compelling manifesto for change in the art world.
We had a chat with Maura Reilly to find out more about her latest book and her inspiring work in general. In an exclusive Widewalls interview, Maura talks about curatorial activism, her work at the Sackler Center for Feminist Art, the Linda Nochlin Reader, counting as a feminist strategy, and much more.
The Work at the Elizabeth A. Sackler Center for Feminist Art
Widewalls: You are the Founding Curator of the Elizabeth A. Sackler Center for Feminist Art at the Brooklyn Museum, where you established the first exhibition space in the world dedicated exclusively to feminist art. How do you see the role of such a space in a renewed mainstream interest in feminist art?
Maura Reilly: I don’t agree that there is a sustained interest in feminist art. I think there is a temporary, fleeting interest at the moment.
Widewalls: While at the Sackler Center for Feminist Art, you organized several exhibitions, including the permanent reinstallation of Judy Chicago’s The Dinner Party. The museum is now revisiting this acclaimed piece with a show examining its formal, material, and conceptual development. How would you describe the legacy of this work and its relevance today?
MR: The Dinner Party is one of the most significant artworks of the 20th century—in scale, content, and influence. It’s also very dated—specific to the 1970s. In order to remain relevant today, I believe its content needs to be shared online and brought-up-to-date, which is why, while there, I built the Dinner Party database, which has entries for all of the 1,083 women featured therein. That database needs to be expanded, renewed; more lectures on the work and its legacy held, especially given the installation is meant to be on view permanently.
Linda Nochlin and Counting as a Feminist Strategy
Widewalls: Over 40 years ago, Linda Nochlin posed the controversial question regarding the existence of “great” women artists, arguing it was opportunity, not ability, that held women back historically. Her groundbreaking body of work that continues to inform feminist artists and art theoreticians is honored in the “Women Artists: The Linda Nochlin Reader,” which you edited in 2015. What was your motivation for editing this book?
MR: Linda was my MA and Ph.D. advisor at the Institute of Fine Arts, New York University. Over the years, we became close friends and collaborators—co-writing essays and co-curating exhibitions, notably the Global Feminisms show we organized for the Brooklyn Museum in 2007. Towards the end of her life, I felt compelled to pay homage to her and thought a compilation of her writings on women artists would be a wonderful contribution to the fields of art history, women’s studies, and visual art, in general. She was very proud of that book. It was a labor of love, but I’m thrilled I did it.
Widewalls: In 2015, you published an essay titled “Taking the Measure of Sexism: Facts, Figures, and Fixes” where you present the factual data that illustrates the gender gap in the art world. What is the significance of statistics and empirical data in the methodology of a feminist theoretician?
MR: Counting is a feminist strategy—or so the Guerrilla Girls have demonstrated. One can argue that women artists are discriminated against but with a graph or chart chockfull of empirical data there can be no denying it. Numbers don’t lie.
Widewalls: In the last few years, we are witnessing a resurgence of all-women shows, as well as the rise of major solo shows of women artists. What do you think is the reason behind this and what kind of impact could it have regarding the gender disparity?
MR: Again, I don’t think a handful of all-women or solo women shows represents a “resurgence.”
Widewalls: This year, you have published a book titled “Curatorial Activism: Towards an Ethics of Curating”. Could you tell us something about this publication? What does curatorial activism mean to you?
MR: “Curatorial activism,” is a term I use to designate the practice of organizing art exhibitions with the principal aim of ensuring that certain constituencies of artists are no longer ghettoized or excluded from the master narratives of art. It is a practice that commits itself to counter-hegemonic initiatives that give voice to those who have been historically silenced or omitted altogether—and, as such, focuses almost exclusively on work produced by women, artists of color, non-Euro-Americans, and/or queer artists. The thesis of my book takes as its operative assumption that the art system—its history, institutions, market, press, and so forth—is a hegemony that privileges white male creativity to the exclusion of all Other artists. It also insists that this white Western male viewpoint, which has been unconsciously accepted as the prevailing viewpoint, “may––and does––prove to be inadequate not merely on moral and ethical grounds, or because it is elitist, but on purely intellectual ones.”
The book itself is a manifesto for change in the art world.
Editors’ Tip: Curatorial Activism: Towards an Ethics of Curating by Maura Reilly
Arranged in thematic sections focusing on feminism, race, and sexuality, Curatorial Activism examines and illustrates pioneering examples of exhibitions that have broken down boundaries and demonstrated that new approaches are possible, from Linda Nochlin’s “Women Artists” at LACMA in the mid-1970s to Jean-Hubert Martin’s “Carambolages” in 2016 at the Grand Palais in Paris. Profiles key exhibitions by pioneering curators including Okwui Enwezor, Linda Nochlin, Jean-Hubert Martin and Nan Goldin, with a foreword by Lucy Lippard, internationally known art critic, activist and curator, and early champion of feminist art, this volume is both an invaluable source of practical information for those who understand that institutions must be a driving force in this area and a vital source of inspiration for today’s expanding new generation of curators.
Featured image: Maura Reilly, photo by Andrew Watson.
Intending the National Academy to be an organization of the leading artists and architects shaping American visual culture, the founders stipulated that upon election, each National Academician present a representative work, or diploma work, that becomes part of the permanent collection. This legacy has guided the formation of a collection unlike any other in the United States, shaped by the artist and architect members. Thus, the Academy’s collection embodies the institution’s distinctive history, which has intersected with and catalyzed the development of 19th through 21st century American art.
Representing more than 2,000 artists and architects, this preeminent collection spans 200 years of history and includes nearly 8,000 works of art, from paintings, drawings, sculptures, watercolors, prints, photographs, videos, and mixed-media works, to architectural drawings, renderings, and models. It is our pleasure to share news about newly submitted works by artists Eve Aschheim, Tom Burckhardt, and Dread Scott to the Academy’s collection.
Eve Aschheim (NA 2017)
Oil and graphite on canvas on panel
18 1/4 x 14 1/16 in.
Tom Burckhardt (NA 2016)
As of Yet Untitled, 2012
Oil on cast plastic
16 x 20 in.
The National Academy Affiliated Fellow (NAAF) program has been a success in generating a talented group of strong candidates for selection from its inception in 2015. The purpose of the NAAF is to provide an opportunity for mid-career artists and architects to advance their skills through interacting and working in one of the oldest and most inspiring cosmopolitan cities in the world while living in the dynamic community of artists, architects and scholars at the American Academy in Rome (AAR) (www.aarome.org).
Now in its third year, the Abbey Council is happy to announce this year’s Fellow is Chuck Webster, visual artist, who will be heading to the AAR for an eight-week residency to begin in January, 2017 and continue through mid-March.
The NAAF is supported by the Abbey Fund with the aim to create an opportunity for a visual artist or architect to enrich their career through study in the inspiring historic city of Rome at AAR. Abbey Council members: James Siena, NA, Chair; Walter Chatham, NA; Ann Hamilton, NA; Walter Hood, NA; and Billie Tsien, NA and Melissa Meyer, NA would like to thank all of the candidates that were nominated this year.
The National Academy thanks the Abbey Council for their diligence and thoughtfulness in selecting the winner of the 2017 National Academy Affiliated Fellowship.
Click below to view gallery
Members of the National Academy recently circulated a letter in support of fellow NA Dana Schutz’s exhibition at the ICA-Boston, which was reported on in Artnews, Art Forum, and elsewhere. Since its release, even more NAs have added their names, and an updated list of 94 signers, along with the letter in full, is below.